No Score Found.
Next Step: See What Slow Hiring Is Costing You
If your grade is below an A, your hiring process is costing you real money. The next step is to quantify it. Here’s 10 Actionable Tips to help you improve your score for next time – we’ve sent a copy of your answers to your email for reference.
Want a customized Workforce Speed Index Report for your company? Let’s talk.
Grade Levels: How Fast & Effective Is Your Hiring Process?
Thank you for taking the WSI Assessment. Here’s what your score means:
A (90-100): World-Class Hiring System (Elite)
Your hiring process is a competitive advantage. You operate with speed, precision, and efficiency, securing top talent before your competitors. Hiring is a core function, not an afterthought, and your structured process ensures consistent success.
B (80-89): Competitive, But With Room for Optimization (Strong)
Your hiring process is solid, but small inefficiencies are costing you talent and revenue. You move faster than most, but delays still creep in. Refining decision-making speed and candidate experience can take you to the next level.
C (70-79): Struggling to Keep Up With Workforce Demands (Needs Immediate Improvement)
Your hiring process is slowing down your business. Talent shortages aren’t just an external issue—you’re contributing to them with a slow, inconsistent hiring approach. Expect higher turnover, lost candidates, and missed revenue opportunities unless changes are made.
D (60-69): Losing Talent, Productivity & Profitability (Severe Hiring Bottlenecks)
Your hiring process is a liability. Hiring delays, indecisiveness, and lack of structure are costing you top candidates, increasing vacancies, and impacting productivity. Without a major overhaul, hiring will continue to be a roadblock to growth and profitability.
F (0-59): Critical Risk—Your Workforce Strategy Is Failing (Act Now)
Your hiring system is in crisis. Severe bottlenecks, lack of urgency, and leadership misalignment are putting your company at risk. Competitors are outpacing you in securing talent, and revenue loss from vacancies is likely significant. Immediate intervention is necessary.
